Security Council resolutions, Iraq,Israel,ec.
An interesting commentary on the issue in Jerusalem Post, particularly as it relates to US abstaining from using it's veto on the resolution about the Israeli siege of Mukata in Ramallah (of course they introduced a resolution draft on it as well), and the consistency in expecting compliance to those resolutions. Mostly in terms of just how much leeway you can afford with looking the other way if you're selling the case against Iraq with the resolution non-compliance (among other things, obviously) at the same time. All in all, seems like an unusually daft move on the part of Israel's government, caving into to the urge "to do something" and going about it in a rather unproductive manner to their own interests, seems like all it accomplished was to provide more ammunition for the anti-Israel camp. That said, US is putting some pressure on Israel over the issue, and if nothing else I suppose it serves as a reminder that the respective national interests obviously differ.
An interesting commentary on the issue in Jerusalem Post, particularly as it relates to US abstaining from using it's veto on the resolution about the Israeli siege of Mukata in Ramallah (of course they introduced a resolution draft on it as well), and the consistency in expecting compliance to those resolutions. Mostly in terms of just how much leeway you can afford with looking the other way if you're selling the case against Iraq with the resolution non-compliance (among other things, obviously) at the same time. All in all, seems like an unusually daft move on the part of Israel's government, caving into to the urge "to do something" and going about it in a rather unproductive manner to their own interests, seems like all it accomplished was to provide more ammunition for the anti-Israel camp. That said, US is putting some pressure on Israel over the issue, and if nothing else I suppose it serves as a reminder that the respective national interests obviously differ.
